Incidents ranging from stone-throwing to police to arson were carried out by a part of the Muslim community in violent demonstrations against Nupur Sharma in the Prophet’s controversy after Friday prayers. Action in which the police arrested the perpetrators. And, at the home of Javed Pump, who was the mastermind of Prayagraj’s violence, he was run over. But, it seems that the Islamic community of India is also divided by the controversy of the Prophet’s comments. Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind Where he has decided to provide legal assistance to Muslim criminals. Right there Jamaat Ulema-e-Hind He strongly condemned the violent demonstrations. The controversy of the Prophet’s comment states that Muslims around the world are angry about this. Therefore, this disparity in the views of the two Islamic Jamiats of India is striking. And no doubt the question will arise: who is the ideal among these Jamiats for Muslims?
After the controversy of the Prophet’s comment, the Muslim Jamiats also seem to be divided.
first thing Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind De. To save Muslim criminals in the controversy of the Prophet’s comments, this Islamic organization will give them legal assistance. Not only that, Maulana Arshad Madani of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind has also spoken of giving legal assistance to the terrorist Waliullah, who was sentenced to death in the serial bomb explosion at the Sankat Mochan temple in Varanasi in 2006. Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind has also reached the Supreme Court against the action of demolishing the house of Javed Pump, the mastermind of the Prayagraj violence, with an excavator.
now let’s talk Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind, Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind has described the violent demonstrations of Muslims in many parts of the country as a conspiracy of the intelligence. Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind has called for the arrest of criminals and the action of excavators against the brains of violence, not against Muslims but against criminals. Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind believes that Nupur Sharma has made a mistake. But violent demonstrations and thinking “separate from the head” cannot be justified for him. Even the Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind has spoken of issuing a fatwa against violence. Against the provocative statements of the head of AIMIM, Asaduddin Owaisi, Maulana Mahmood Madani of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind and many clerics, this Islamic organization has also spoken of issuing a fatwa with the support of 1000 ulema.
The organizations of both Muslims, why the difference of opinion?
Last month, a conference of the World Council of Muslim Communities was held in the United Arab Emirates. In which Muslim religious leaders from many countries had met. The Egyptian Minister, Dr. Mohamed Mokhtar Goma, who was part of this conference, had said that “instead of contributing to Islamic unity by creating a separate country, Muslims should respect their country, their flag and their land. “. Because, it is not possible on a rational basis. On the one hand there is the Minister of Egypt Dr. Mohamed Mokhtar Goma. So on the other hand, there are Islamic extremists and terrorist organizations around the world. Those who try to establish the domination of Islam worldwide by any means. However, this is not possible on a logical basis. But, this is the face of a thought within Islam.
The important reason for stating this statement by the Egyptian Minister here is that Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind It is one of these Islamic organizations. Who regards India as his country and follows its constitution and law honestly. At the same time, what calls itself the largest organization of Muslims Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind He defends only Islamic laws for Muslims in India. On many issues such as the Common Civil Code, Triple Talaq, Gyanvapi and Mathura Idgah Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, under the guise of the Constitution, claims Islamic laws as their fundamental rights. Maulana Mehmood Madani, who is associated with Jamiat in a procession, says that everyone should understand that our food (Muslims) is different, the language is different, the dress is different. However, they do not explain how the language of UP Muslims and Kerala Muslims is one. How is the dress? How is the food?
Why not a country above religion?
Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind Maulana Suhaib Qasmi says that “there is no doubt that these words cannot be tolerated for the Prophet Muhammad.” But when the government and the law are doing their job. So what was the need for violent demonstrations? The sudden awakening of love for the Prophet 15 days after Nupur Sharma’s statement indicates a certain agenda of intelligence. Because, the demand for love with the Prophet was that he would have reacted the same day. But those teachers who do not consider India’s growing image in the world and our government’s relations with Arab countries as part of its agenda. He instigated the Muslims. Along with this, Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind gave the example of an old woman who threw rubbish at the Prophet Muhammad and said that the requirement of Islam was that Nupur Sharma would be forgiven.
Right there Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind There are totally different opinions on this subject. This organization talks about giving importance to Islamic law on issues like CAA, Ram Mandir, triple talaq. Maulana Mahmood Madani of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind believes that there can be no worldly interference in religious matters. Simply put, for some 200 million Muslims in India, this Islamic organization can be considered in favor of the implementation of Sharia law. Can this exemption be given to Muslims in a democratic country like India? In fact, Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind sells this dream to the Muslims of the country. which can never be fulfilled. And for that, religious organizations like Muslim Personal Law Board are used.
Jamaat Ulama-e-Hind Speaking of the Muslim tanjims, he said, “Which tanjim in this country speaks of the totality of 135 million people, who consider their religion as half of their faith? How will the Tanjim, who consider themselves to be its duty to speak of only about 20 million people? If you look, those who call themselves the largest Muslim organization Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind He should have presented the controversy of the Prophet’s comments and asked the people to keep the peace and trust in the law. But after the violent demonstrations, he limited himself to providing legal assistance to Muslim criminals.