Punjab-Haryana High Court reprimanded a private school in Panchkula and Haryana government for denying a disabled child the right to basic education

listen to the news

The Punjab-Haryana High Court has reprimanded a private school in Panchkula and the Haryana government for denying the right to basic education to a disabled child. The Court said that depending on the child’s mental state, the school and the government cannot escape their responsibility by pleading guilty. They deserve a sentence.

While filing the petition, the woman said her 13-year-old son is a victim of Down syndrome. For the last 5 years he was studying in the special wing of a private school in Panchkula. Despite being a person with a disability, he has won state and national medals in roller skating and swimming at the Special Olympics. The petitioner stated that he had requested an individual education program for the child. After that, the school began sending complaints about her son’s sudden fury. After a while the school asked for the child to be out of school, begging for the safety of the rest of the children. When the petitioner complained about this, the officers’ committees investigated and presented their report. In these reports, the boy was told to get angry soon.

The Court, after hearing the arguments of the school and the government, while giving its decision, said that children up to 14 years have a fundamental right to education. The function of the school is to provide education to the children and the function of the state is to provide the necessary resources. No matter how many difficulties there are in this task, neither the school nor the government can escape their responsibility.

The court said that before students with disabilities used to face problems to advance, but today the time has changed. There are also laws that protect your rights. The court has regretted that, although everything is present, the full benefit of this is not being given to children with disabilities, as there is a lack of sensitivity in those who have been given the responsibility to obey. the bear.

The school tried to save itself by blaming the boy

The court said that in this case the school tried to defend itself by blaming the child. In this effort, state government officials took a bureaucratic approach during the investigation and supported the school. The court said the work of the school and the state must be strongly condemned. No matter how many difficulties may arise, the state and the school should have fulfilled their responsibility by finding solutions.

Until the child studies, the school will cover the expenses.

The Court has ordered the school to admit the child. The Court said that for three years the child’s education has been affected, so as a punishment, the school will have to bear the child’s expenses until the child studies in the ‘school.

Expansion

The Punjab-Haryana High Court has reprimanded a private school in Panchkula and the Haryana government for denying the right to basic education to a disabled child. The Court said that depending on the child’s mental state, the school and the government cannot escape their responsibility by pleading guilty. They deserve a sentence.

While filing the petition, the woman said her 13-year-old son is a victim of Down syndrome. For the last 5 years he was studying in the special wing of a private school in Panchkula. Despite being a person with a disability, he has won state and national medals in roller skating and swimming at the Special Olympics. The petitioner stated that he had requested an individual education program for the child. After that, the school began sending complaints about her son’s sudden fury. After a while the school asked for the child to be out of school, begging for the safety of the rest of the children. When the petitioner complained about this, the officers’ committees investigated and presented their report. In these reports, the boy was told to get angry soon.

The Court, after hearing the arguments of the school and the government, while giving its decision, said that children up to 14 years have a fundamental right to education. The function of the school is to provide education to the children and the function of the state is to provide the necessary resources. No matter how many difficulties there are in this task, neither the school nor the government can escape their responsibility.

The court said that before students with disabilities used to face problems to advance, but today the time has changed. There are also laws that protect your rights. The court has lamented that, despite everything available, not all the benefit of this is being given to children with disabilities, as there is a lack of sensitivity in those who have been given the responsibility to follow them. .

The school tried to save itself by blaming the boy

The court said that in this case the school tried to defend itself by blaming the child. In this effort, state government officials took a bureaucratic approach during the investigation and supported the school. The court said the work of the school and the state must be strongly condemned. No matter how many difficulties may arise, the state and the school should have fulfilled their responsibility by finding solutions.

Until the child studies, the school will cover the expenses.

The Court has ordered the school to admit the child. The Court said that for three years the child’s education has been affected, so as a punishment, the school will have to bear the child’s expenses until the child studies in the ‘school.

Leave a Comment