listen to the news
After walking door-to-door for 19 years to the child who was orphaned at age five, the country’s highest court finally gave justice. The Supreme Court ordered that he be given a job out of compassion.
A bench of Judge Hemant Gupta and Judge Vikram Nath rejected the Uttar Pradesh government’s claim that giving compassionate work after so many years would set a wrong precedent. The bank said: “If it is a wrong precedent, then it is wrong. The difficulties the children (the applicant and his sister) had to go through over the years can be well understood. During the hearing , the court also noted that these children residing with their maternal grandparents were deprived of financial benefits, including the pension for more than 15 years.
He also received pensions and other arrears in 2019 when a petition for contempt was filed against the state government. The bank said it is a suitable case to impose a fine on the state government. The Supreme Court did not impose a fine on the state government on the repeated requests of the lawyer appearing for the state government not to pay the fine, but taking a humane approach, within two months, the affected authority had to grant Ganesh Shankar Shukla (petitioner) the educational degree. The order has been given to give job according to the base.
Attorney Ashutosh Yadav, who introduced petitioner Ganesh, argued that Ganesh had reached a majority in 2015 and passed the midterm exam in 2016. After getting a majority, he learned about the right to get a job. for compassionate reasons. After that, he approached several forums.
What’s going on?
According to the petition, Ganesh’s mother, Geeta Devi Shukla, was an assistant teacher at a primary school in Ramabai Nagar district (Kanupar Dehat). Geeta Devi died on March 13, 2003. At that time Ganesh was only five years old while his sister was eight. The father was already dead. Children who were orphaned from an early age were raised by their maternal grandfather. The department did not pay Geeta Devi’s dues / funds to the petitioner. In December 2008, a representation was submitted on behalf of the petitioner to the competent authority to release the pension / fund, but the authority did nothing.
In 2016, the court ordered the authority concerned to grant a family pension. For non-compliance with this order, a petition for contempt was filed, then the pension was issued, but no relief from compassionate work was obtained. Ganesh filed a request for special permission (SLP) in the Supreme Court after not getting any relief from the Allahabad High Court.